This page draws on reviewed versions in the current AI collection. It includes revisions, Briefs and Playbook test records; new Explainers remain in Questions. Dates below are when Atlas recorded and reviewed a version, not necessarily its first publication date. An editorial revision does not by itself mean the underlying facts changed.
Titles and reasons come from the saved versions; the title link opens the current article. Test dates refer to execution. A new review or a changed deadline is not a new test. Brief links state which article revision they address and disappear from current advice if that revision is replaced or unavailable. The Atom feed uses the same reviewed entries.
The learning comparison asked whether a stored experience improved later results. This follow-up asks which parts of a saved work record still apply after the task or source changes. It tests a different question and does not rerun the original comparison.
For the reader. When reusing a work record, check the source, version and scope behind each conclusion. Preserve valid work and explain what needed a new check; these results do not establish a benefit from extra memory.
Clarified native Codex resume, sharpened the title, brought the steps forward and added file excerpts showing what the changed assignment required. The recorded test is unchanged.
Existing test retained. Last run: . This revision adds no new execution evidence.
Clarified the baseline ceiling and learning definition; simplified results and moved the explanatory loop to the opening.
Compare the takeaway
Before
Give experience a route into future work, and a way to be rejected. Adopt a new method when checked outcomes justify it; keep the baseline when they do not.
In this version
An agent learns from experience when it uses past outcomes to change how it handles a new task. Whether that change helps needs a separate check.
Refines the opening, headings and prose for clarity and flow; preserves claims, sources, examples and limitations.
Compare the takeaway
Before
An agent chooses from the market it can see, using the evidence and customer context available to it. Your advantage must survive that translation—and being the recommended brand still may not make you the chosen seller.
In this version
An agent chooses from the market it can see, using the evidence and customer context available to it. Your advantage needs to remain visible through that process. Even then, being the recommended brand may not make you the chosen seller.
Explains how agents choose companies; moves the unchanged tested drafting pilot into its own guide.
Compare the takeaway
Before
Prepare on two fronts: make your offer dependable when customers use agents, and improve one complete workflow inside the company. Invest further only when customer value, economics and control hold up.
In this version
An agent chooses from the market it can see, using the evidence and customer context available to it. Your advantage must survive that translation—and being the recommended brand still may not make you the chosen seller.
Adds strategic choices for customer access, differentiated value, workflow economics and delegated authority. The original four-step pilot and its test remain unchanged.
Compare the takeaway
Before
Keep customer facts accurate, give one workflow clear limits, and inspect the result before expanding delegation.
In this version
Prepare on two fronts: make your offer dependable when customers use agents, and improve one complete workflow inside the company. Invest further only when customer value, economics and control hold up.
Grouped perspectives by question, added two Indian voices, clarified chart takeaways and illustrated the delegation cycle. Business guidance moves to a companion Playbook.
Highlighted the key chart comparisons and thinned the scale guides. Reorganized the individual perspectives and business actions into compact, sourced cards and time-horizon columns. Evidence and numeric values are unchanged.
Replaced raster figures with readable native charts, data tables and scenario text; added an Atlas SVG cover. Rounded displayed percentages and made data origins explicit. Underlying findings are unchanged.